google powermeter and microsoft hohm

Filed under: search engine news — Felipe @ 26 Jun,09

This is beginning to resemble a kindergarten battle now, whatever one search engine does the other goes and copies it and surprisingly this time it has nothing to do with the search market or the annulment of a search engine optimisation technique.

In a attempt to enable consumers to better understand their household energy consumption, Google and Microsoft are testing new software that will help people to save money by providing detailed information about their household energy usage.

“If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it” – Lord Kelvin.

This is the slogan Google is using to promote its new gadget. With Google PowerMeter users will have access to real time information about their electricity usage straight on their iGoogle home page, which will then make it easier for users to understand and reduce energy consumption. Studies revealed that access to your household energy consumption can help you save up to 15% on your monthly bill.

But it’s the larger scale results that Google and also Microsoft are more interested in; for every 6 households that save 10% on electricity this will be the equivalent to taking a conventional car off the road.

Microsoft’s energy saving gadget is called Hohm and like Google’s is still in its beta version and at present are only available for US users, both gadgets are likely to be open to the general public towards the end of the year.

tofollow or nofollow: that is the question

Every time Google makes an official announcement about an SEO technique, the effects on the SEO community can be compared to an earthquake or a tsunami and this time wasn’t different, since Matt Cutts announced that “PageRank Sculpting” could no longer be performed using the nofollow tag, site owners and SEOs have gone mad.

What is PageRank Sculpting?

First of all, the only way to pass PageRank is via links on a given page. Now imagine a page with £10 of PageRank to spend, this page has 10 outbound links, these links could be to other pages inside the same site or to other sites, that doesn’t matter, the point is each link will receive £1.

Let’s say we used the nofollow tag on 5 of those links, till now it was believed that the other 5 links would get £2  instead of £1 each which would help those five pages rank a bit better. So let’s say there is a login page within your or less important pages that you don’t want to rank well, before you could nofollow the links to those pages and direct PageRank to more important pages, that is how PageRank Sculpting worked.

The Death of PageRank Sculpting

“What happens when you have a page with ‘ten PageRank points’ and ten outgoing links, and five of those links are no followed? Let’s leave aside the decay factor to focus on the core part of the question. Originally, the five links without nofollow would have flowed two points of PageRank each (in essence, the nofollowed links didn’t count toward the denominator when dividing PageRank by the outdegree of the page). More than a year ago, Google changed how the PageRank flows so that the five links without nofollow would flow one point of PageRank each.”

The above is quote from Matt Cutts’ announcing the death of PageRank sculpting; well at least with the use of the nofollow tag. Basically what Matt is saying that, links with a nofollow tag still get no “PageRank money” at all and regular links continue to get £1 each.

What makes me laugh is the SEOs who have been quoting the benefits of their “PageRank Sculpting” over the past year, when Google changed the way PageRank flows over a year ago.

Conclusion

To sum things up on how Google assigns PageRank here is a quote from Danny Sullivan that explains the matter in a simple and easy to understand way:

“Google itself solely decides how much PageRank will flow to each and every link on a particular page. In general, the more links on a page, the less PageRank each link gets. Google might decide some links don’t deserve credit and give them no PageRank. The use of nofollow doesn’t ‘conserve’ PageRank for other links; it simply prevents those links from getting any PageRank that Google otherwise might have given them.”

keyword research: the key to success

Keyword research is the first, and in my opinion the most important task in the search engine optimisation process, this is why you need as much data as possible on each keyword you are planning in implementing on your site.

First thing you need to know about a keyword is its search volume, the higher the better, Google Keywords Tool is showing local search volume now which is very useful for geo-targeted sites. Once you have the search volume you need to compare against the competition on that given keyword, here is a simple rule of thumb, higher search volume against low competition.

Ok, now you have the search volume and the competition of your keywords, but what if you wanted to know more about it, like how many sites are using your keywords on their title tags? For that you will need a special command when you perform a search just type intitle:keywordname to refine it use intitle:”keywordname” that will give an exact match.

What about how many sites have my keywords in their URLS? To find that out use inurl:keywordname again to refine it inurl:”keywordname”.

Want to know how many sites have your keywords in the anchor text of links point back to them? Use inanchor:keywordname and to find out how many sites use your keywords in their description tags use intext:keywordname

Always remember to refine results to an exact match just quote the term, this also works for a normal search query.

All these commands are very useful to tell how much competition a certain keyword has and to determine how hard it will be to rank for them.

“fear grips google” says the ny post

Filed under: SEO,search engine news — Tags: , , , — Felipe @ 16 Jun,09

Microsoft’s new search engine ‘Bing’ has been live for almost two weeks now and already statistics show an increase in its market share by 2% jumping from the 9% previously registered by the Live.com to 11%.

You would think that if you were the owner of a company that has over 60% of market share that wouldn’t be enough to raise any eye brows, well that is not how Google’s co-founder Sergey Brin thinks.

According the NY Post, sources inside the search juggernaut said Sergey Brin assembled a team of his best search engineers to study Bing’s algorithm and determine how it differs from the one he created with his classmate Lary Page back in 1998, as well as work on urgent upgrades to his own.

Sergey’s move generated chaos in the search world as it is not common these days for Google founders to get their hands dirty in operations at the company anymore.

Speaking to the NY Post a Google insider said:

“New search engines have come and gone in the past 10 years, but Bing seems to be of particular interest to Sergey,”

To deny such a move from the search behemoth a spokesman for Google stated:

“We always have a team working on improving search. We dedicate more time and energy to search than anything else in our company. Our algorithm is constantly evolving.”

If it is true or not that Google is studying Bing’s algorithm we will never know for sure, but one thing is certain you better treating a cancer while it’s on its early stages.

So, what say you? Is Bing really a threat to Google? Will this “urgent upgrade” ordered by Sergey Brin have any affect in search engine optimisation?

Leave your thought and opinions in our comments section below.

Google Wave – Google’s New Wave Maker

Since its announcement Google Wave has dominated the pages of tech blogs and news sites all over the world, this is set to be Google’s biggest product launch in years.

Google-Wave-logo

Google Wave is a real time communication platform that combines aspects of email, wikis, web chat, social networking, project management and file sharing all in one powerful in-browser communication client.

Since Google announced this super communication platform, the buzz around it has been so huge that it outshone Microsoft’s Bing, coincidence or not Google announced Google Wave on the same day Microsoft confirmed Bing would be the name of its new search engine.

Unfortunately, our SEO team here at THUK haven’t had the pleasure to test Google’s new toy yet, Google Wave is only available for a few lucky developers as an alpha version so we have to rely on reviews we found over the internet to talk about it.

Ben Parr from Mashable is one of the lucky users who had the chance to test it and posted a guide to Google Wave, even though the product is not even out yet.

Danny Sullivan from SEL was at the official announcement at Google I/O and live blogged about it.

When it is ready, Google Wave will be a live flexible stream of conversation to best suit users needs, a full integration with Google Docs is already confirmed plus the ability to handle any kind of data inside a wave.

To finish things of here is a video of Google Wave official announcement at this years Google I/O.

google responds to threats with two new products

Filed under: SEO,hedgehog digital,search engine news — Tags: , , — Felipe @ 09 Jun,09

Over the past few weeks Google has been under attack; no! wait before you panic, these attacks are neither from hackers nor spammers, even though that happens on a daily basis, for that we have Matt Cutts and his team. When I say attacks, I’m referring to other companies trying to reduce Google’s search market share.

First it was the launch of Wolfram Alpha a fact search engine which in reality represents no serious threat to Google, then Twitter announced TwitterSearch will start crawling links within Twitter and indexing pages in real time, with a yet to be developed algorithm, and finally came Bing, Microsoft’s new search engine with the promises of better search refinements and a strong marketing campaign.

Despite all those attacks Google is looking strong as ever and announced the launch of two new products, Google Squared and Google Wave, the first is already available in Google Labs and the second we will have to wait a few more months before is available.

Google Squared

Google Squared is an experimental search tool that collects facts from the web and presents them in an organized collection, similar to a spreadsheet. If you search for [roller coasters], Google Squared builds a square with rows for each of several specific roller coasters and columns for corresponding facts, such as image, height and maximum speed.

This technology is by no means perfect. That’s why we designed Google Squared to be conversational, enabling you to respond to the initial result and get a better answer. If there’s another row or column you’d like to see, you can add it and Google Squared will automatically attempt to fetch and fill in the relevant facts for you.

Visit us tomorrow; we will be uploading information on Googles biggest product launch in years – Google Wave

Bing’s Beta Version is Live

Bing – Microsoft’s new and improved search engine named went live two days ago, well at least the beta version of it. The official launch is due to coincide with Microsoft’s Dr. Qi Lu presentation tomorrow at Search Engine Land’s Search Marketing Convention SMX Advanced in Seattle.

As Live.com is still live and users can currently opt to use either service, so far what we are seeing is the preview version of Bing. However as of today Microsoft will replace Live.com with Bing.

Bing has been live for only one day and there are already thousands of reviews of Microsoft’s newly improved search engine available on the net. Unfortunately people outside the US are seeing a local version of Bing without most of the new features. If you can’t wait to exploit and play around with Bing, select United States as your default region.

(found this tip on Techmeme)

These two videos perfectly describe and explain how Bing works, they are both being used as part of Microsoft multi-million marketing campaign to promote Bing’s services and capabilities.

Microsoft Bing Search – Product Tour of Bing.com

Microsoft Bing “Decision Engine” Launch

Have you tried Bing yet? If so we would like to hear your thoughts and opinions, so please leave them in our comments section.

is digg a better place without shouts?

Digg users received another surprise this past week as the shouts systems have been disabled; the days of selecting 200 of your most loyal friends and sending them a shout with your latest submission, are over.

The only way to share your submissions now is via email, Facebook, Twitter or IM. I’m not sure what Digg’s intentions were when they decided to remove shouts, for me that was the best way to keep up to date with my friends’ submissions and share my submissions with them.

No more shouts means it will be even harder for average Digg users to try and get their stories promoted to the first page. Some might say, write good and appealing content and your stories will receive diggs and eventually become popular, well, now more than ever I can agree with that and thanks to the recommendation engine stories could reach a broader audience.

I am divided about these changes implemented by Digg, from one side it will be harder for me to track my likeminded friends activities, whose stories I enjoy, and without shouting my stories to my friends, I believe the numbers of diggs on my submission will drop drastically. But on the other hand, this could make Digg’s home page a bit more democratic with good content writers managing to break through what is dominated by a dozen or so called Power Diggers.

Besides from not making my mind up yet on Digg being a better place with or without shouts, I have some questions that hopefully I find the answers in the weeks to come.

1 – Has Digg’s Algorithm changed?

2 – Will the numbers of submissions of average Digg users drop without shouts?

3 – Is Digg protecting its “Power” users by removing shouts and reducing the chances of average users getting their stories promoted to the first page?

Are you a Digger? If so what you have to say about Digg removing the shouts the button?

Feel free to express your feeling and thoughts in our comments section.